One state for
Palestinians and Israelis?
A conference at
the Harvard Kennedy school last weekend considered a “one state
solution” for the Israeli Palestinian stalemate. The idea is to
have Israelis and Palestinians live in one state.
The conference,
and the issue it examined, has provoked sharp criticism from some
traditional Jewish organizations and individuals. The one state
solution, they say, would spell the end of the Jewish state.
But what is a
Jewish state? Originally described as “a homeland for all Jews”
it suggested a place where Jews could find refuge from persecution
they experience in many places around the globe. A Jewish state is
often also described as a state where Judaism is the official
religion. But for Jews like myself, whose family has been secular for
a century or more, a religious Jewish state would not be a homeland
because I would not be welcome there. Clearly a Jewish state cannot
be characterized by any specific official religion.
A Jewish state is
then often described as a nation state but one where Jews are in the
majority. There is an American state, a German state, a French state
and so on. In each, significant portions of the population are
second-class citizens. America, even after the election of President
Obama, is not very hospitable to persons of color, whether they be
Black, Hispanic, or Arab. In Germany, until very recently, the German
born children of Turkish or Greek immigrants were not German
citizens. Similar discrimination against immigrants from North Africa
exist in France.
Nation states, in
theory, embrace different ethnic groups, but in practice few manage
to avoid giving preferred status to some groups over others. Israel
as a Jewish
state is not even in theory hospitable to all the people living in
Israel, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Arabs. In the Jewish state of
Israel only Jews are full citizens, and, in fact, not even all Jews.
Traditionally, the European Jews have had more power and status than,
say, the Jews from North Africa, let alone those from Ethiopia.
Nations states do
not make good homelands. Nation states provide homelands for some by
making others homeless.
What is a
homeland? The Jewish tradition talks frequently about welcoming
strangers into your house and treating them as equals. A homeland is
a place where you are civil and caring to people who are different.
It is a place of trust, not of paranoia. It is a place where
strangers are treated as equals and are welcomed. It is a place where
an ethic of trust and welcoming of difference prevails. People living
in a homeland follow a way of life not often observed by citizens of
a national state. National states are violent and so are its
citizens. By their distrust and paranoia, by their need to hate and
to have enemies, they destroy their own nation as a homeland. Feeling
always the threat from, mostly imaginary, enemies they cannot rest in
their home, they cannot be at peace, they must root out their
enemies.
In American terms:
a homeland is a melting pot--a real
melting pot--where everyone is accepted to make their contribution.
It is not a place where we invent enemies, where we are filled with
hate and fear. America is still wrestling with the question of what
sort of homeland it is going to be. So, obviously is Israel.
So yes, let’s
have a homeland for Jews. But let’s also have a homeland for
Palestinians. They have, after all, lived in the same part of the
world for a long time. A real
homeland for Jews and Palestinians. A place of peace and mutual
respect. Nothing less will do.
No comments:
Post a Comment