Who deserves the blame?
When an American soldier went
out to the nearest Afghan village and killed 16 people, a great deal
of attention was focused on this one man. We heard about his family
and his own history. The same happens with the grisly crimes that
fill the daily paper. Teenage boys shooting their classmates. Young
mothers killing their children. Angry husbands killing their wives
and sometimes their children also. Young men shooting other young
men.
In each case there are one or
more individuals accused of the crime and the news focuses on them. A
good deal of attention is then given to what sort of punishment this
person should receive. Where a murder has been committed there is
always mention of the possibility of the death penalty, even if the
accused murderer is only 15 years old.
This intense focus on the
individual murderer has always puzzled me.
When the Boston Red Sox win a
pennant, half of Boston celebrates and gets drunk even though the
celebrants made absolutely no contribution to the victory of the team
– except perhaps paying large sums to sit in the bleachers. People
are “proud to be Americans” even though their individual
contribution to American economic or military power is miniscule or
even completely nonexistent. We take credit for the good things that
happen in our society even when we, actually, did not contribute to
the good event. It gives us a sense of accomplishment. It makes us
important and our lives worthwhile.
But the bad things that happen
always get blamed on specific individuals. When the Red Sox failed
to win a pennant because it's overpaid players were drinking beer in
the clubhouse during the game, did any of us ask ourselves what our
contribution was to this sort of culture of self indulgence and “more
money for me.” Is it conceivable that these undisciplined players
were simply living out the standard life in a consumerist society?
And do all of us who participate in that society not bear some
responsibility for keeping it going?
If our schools have students so
angry and so disillusioned that they are willing to bring a gun to
school and use it, does that not also have to do with us?
News reports say that Sgt.
Bales, accused of killing 16 civilians in Afghanistan, served three
tours in Iraq before he was sent to Afghanistan – clearly unwilling
to go. I'm sure he is not the only one who has served that much time
on the front lines. All the other soldiers who have done similar
service have not gone out to shoot civilians. For sure, but should
we not ask whether the military – and we – put excessive demands
on this person?
Should we not ask whether Sgt.
Bales should have been in Afghanistan at all? Is it possible that all
of us who have been condemning those wars but have not been willing
to protest loudly enough to be heard in Washington have some
responsibility for the continuing damage we are doing to Afghanistan
and to our own soldiers?
If you are “proud to be
American” you should also be ashamed for American soldiers who kill
civilians in Afghanistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment