Welfare?
The unrelenting attack on
welfare programs and on welfare recipients continue. Persons on
welfare are portrayed as slackers, as persons who are dependent, who
refuse to take charge of their lives and to make something of
themselves.
Many observers suggest that
this continuing denigration of a significant number of Americans is
connected to the fact that persons of color are disproportionately
represented among welfare recipients.
Here are some facts:
A significant percentage of
welfare recipients are children. Since 2004/2005, children, not
adults, have made up the majority of welfare cases in California.
Some observers claim that two thirds of welfare recipients are
children.
Besides children, the elderly
consume a significant percentage of annual welfare spending.
According to some accounts, 53 percent of the benefit dollars spent
on entitlement programs spend go to assist the elderly — not to
able-bodied, working-age Americans who choose not to work.
Other welfare recipients that
do not fit the negative stereotypes are single mothers. Women who are
divorced from a violent husband, or a husband who meets his midlife
crisis by marrying a much younger woman, often find themselves unable
to get a job that will support them. While they go back to school,
the government will support them for a few years so that they can
prepare themselves to work and to take care of themselves.
The 'working poor' make up a
fourth important category of welfare recipients. One in four jobs in
the United States today does not pay enough to lift families out of
poverty. The problem is not that people do not work. The problem is
that they don't get paid enough to live without some government
assistance. According to the most recent data available from the
Census Bureau, 104 million people – a third of the population –
have incomes below $38,000 for a family of three.
More people can only find
part-time jobs. That does not provide enough to live on. Besides
part-time jobs do n ot provide health insurance. Part-timers need
government help to pay their medical bills.
The fact that so many jobs will
not pay enough for a family of three to live on, has the side effect
that a certain number of welfare recipients work but their work is
not reported to the government so that they can continue to receive
some assistance to supplement their meager earnings. That tends to
inflate the number of people who are supposedly "welfare
dependent."
According to government
figures, the number of people who could possibly be "welfare
dependent" – dependent on government handouts for many years –
is somewhere between 10 and 20% of all welfare recipients. There is
absolutely no truth in the scare stories of half the American
population being unwilling to take charge of their lives, sitting at
home, waiting for their monthly government check.
Obviously these figures do not
add up. A central difficulty in this highly politicized debate is
that facts are hard to come by. But even if the numbers I have cited
are all exaggerated, it remains incontestable that the stereotype of
the welfare recipient-as-slacker is just that--a stereotype that
bears little resemblance to reality.
Moreover, it is extremely
important to understand whom social welfare benefits. Since a
significant portion of welfare payments go to supplement the
inadequate income of working people, welfare for the poor is, of
course, at the same time welfare for the rich, for employers.
Consider this example: Walmart is well-known to pay extremely low
wages. In some stores the human relations people will tell all new
hires how to get on food stamps and other kinds of government
assistance. Walmart is quite openly admits that wages are too low to
live on. It can charge low prices to its customers because it
underpays its employees. It can get away with that because the
government helps out. In the end the low prices in the Walmart store
are made possible by the social welfare system. The US government
welfare system subsidizes Walmart's profits and the savings realized
by its customers.
Walmart and many other
employers are "welfare dependent." When politicians try to
scare up distrust and animosity against welfare recipients they
should mention Walmart and its customers among them.
We hear a good deal about
American employers whose companies are "lean and mean" and
we are invited to admire their can-do spirit, the private initiative
that makes companies that had been suffering profitable again. But
what makes companies "lean" are the low wages paid to
employees – and not those in the front office either. Companies can
do that because the government will make up some of the difference
between a living wage and what actual American companies pay to their
fellow citizens.
What allows companies to be
"lean and mean," is the government's social welfare system.
American employers are chief among the welfare dependents.
Thank you Uncle Sam.
Great post!
ReplyDelete