Times of Transition
We live in a very
strange time. It is clear to many—but by no means to all—that
momentous changes are taking place but it is by not what those
changes are.
Here are some straws in
the wind.
Both President Obama
and Secretary of State Clinton insisted this week that the US must
remain the leader of the family of nations. We will, we must, they
said, retain the leadership role that we have played since WWII.
Fifty years ago no one would have disputed this. Today, unwavering
commitment to our world leadership appears to be no more than
whistling in the dark. Everyone knows that the days of US hegemony
are coming to an end.
But we do not know what
the world will look like in 30 years.
We live in a time of
rapid and unexpected change. A few years ago it took some courage to
come out as a gay man or woman. Today, state after state is
considering making gay marriage legal; that transformation now has
the blessings of the President. There is tremendous ferment in our
society from conflict over guns to conflict over sexuality; many
changes seem just around the corner, but the future is shrouded in
darkness.
We do not know where we
are going.
Not so long ago a young
person who wanted to help change the world for the better could join
a range of organizations on the political left. They could choose
among a variety of them and choose the one whose political program
seemed most promising. Today a person who wants to make it a better
world—and there are many of them—has to find or invent a specific
project. There are no ready made channels for political and
reformative energy. There are no organizations with wide reaching
political programs. There are only specific projects ranging from
peace in the Mideast to recycling soda bottles to improving a
specific school to banning beggars from the streets, empowering young
women, or growing organic vegetables.
There is a good deal of
energy for all these projects. What will be the global effect of all
of them? We do not know. We do not know what the future holds or how
our world is changing.
The relation between
employer and employee is a difficult one because, with the exception
of very small businesses with only very few employees, employers have
much more power than individual employees. We have dealt with this,
and so have many other countries, by allowing or even supporting
workers organizing themselves in unions in order to enhance their
negotiating power with their employers.
Today union membership
is lower than it has been since the 1930s. Unions have little popular
support, even the members are unenthusiastic. Barely more than 10% of
all employees in the US belong to unions today. Are unions on the way
out? Will employees once again be powerless in the face of the huge
corporations most of them work for? Or are we moving in the direction
of new ways of structuring labor relations?
Since 1975 or so, the
US economy has been pretty stagnant. The incomes of ordinary people
have remained more or less unchanged; annual growth has been a meager
.3%. That's 40 years of stagnation, punctuated by occasional wild
booms and the busts that inevitably follow. Is this what the American
economy will look like for the foreseeable future? It is possible
that "the richest country in the world" will turn to be
shabby and short of funds like most countries in the Third World.
We do not know what
that would be like, and what a future American economy will look
like.
At one time, we had a
popular democracy, a democracy where ordinary people played an
important part. What people wanted counted for a good deal. The
recent presidential race was financed mainly by 35 extremely rich
individuals. The wishes of the people are receding into the
background; we appear, more and more, to live in a plutocracy – the
rule of the rich.
Will there be democracy
in name only 50 years from now or can we save our political system?
Momentous changes into
a future we do not know and, at the moment, do not understand seem to
be taking place.
Only one thing seems
clear: the future will be quite different from our past.
No comments:
Post a Comment