Is
our democracy
a blessing ?
We
have a government that seems in many respects dedicated to
exclusion. The president spends a whole lot of time criticizing and
denigrating different groups of people - his political opponents,
immigrants to the United States, people from Mexico and other Latin
countries, Muslims and many others. At the same time groups that
demand more attention and power for themselves because they claim to
be of a superior kind –for instance white supremacists-- are
growing and becoming more powerful. Not too long ago white supremacy
was thought of as a holdover of slavery and Jim Crow - a movement
stuck in an inglorious past that was bound to wither away.
Instead white supremacy has become, once again, a serious movement.
Nor
is this true only in our country. Comparable groups have grown
and are in the governments of quite a few European countries.
Hysteria in the face of large numbers of immigrants from the near
East and Africa dominates politics. The main desire of large
groups of people is to exclude masses of immigrants who are poor and
looking for work. In a clearly global economy where are many
countries profit from trade and where industry is dominated by
large multinational corporations, nationalists in many countries
resist the global labor market, the free movement across
frontiers to where there is work. This resistance to folks who don't
speak your language or don't speak it well, who may have different
religions from yours and certainly bring with them different
traditions in food and family structure is a major theme in
Brexit, England's attempt to distance itself from the European
Union. The claim to national superiority of Jews over Palestinians is
the motivating force in much of Israeli politics.
The
right-wing movements in different countries are different but they
have some common features. They have no respect for political
equality. Democracy does not seem to them to be important, neither
are political rights - the right to free speech, to political
participation, to form associations and for those
associations to meet. Police violence against critics of right-wing
governments is readily accepted as legitimate.
The
frequent tendency of peoples to move away from democracy raises many
interesting questions and gives rise to many controversies. But today
I want to pay attention to one specific aspect of these occurrences.
Very many of the right wing, ultra right-wing, or fascist movements
come to power by democratic means. The persons who end up as fascist
dictators are first elected. That was true of Adolf Hitler as well as
of the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, or of Egypt’s
General Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and many others. The current president
of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, soon after being elected
president instituted a regime of violence against alleged drug
dealers or users. Thousands of Philippinos have lost their lives,
killed by police or vigilantes for alleged drug selling or use,
without any judicial process. It looks as if proved
very popular in the mid-term elections of this past weekend. The
thousands of alleged drug dealers and users killed by police in the
last 4 years have not made him unacceptable to voters in the
Philippines.
Most
commonly when we talk about democracy, what we have in mind is a
political system of regular and honest elections, civil rights and
political rights for all citizens as well as the rule of of law to
protect those rights. But it turns out that that is not enough for a
lasting democracy. In countries that have regular elections, a
functioning legal system and civil and political rights, the
electorate has more than once voted and continues to vote for enemies
of democracy. People have more than once passed referenda to extend
the term of office of the strongman whose rule spells the end of
democracy. People have acclaimed these dictators and have gladly
followed their commands and have after the end of their term been
happy to re-elect them in clean and ordinary elections.
A
well-functioning and honest electoral system is not what democracy
is. A functioning democracy exists only where the people at large not
only participate at least by voting but also participate by
protesting loudly as soon as the candidates they have elected turn
out to be enemies of democracy. If the state legislatures
in States like Ohio or North Carolina draw the electoral districts in
ways to deprive black voters of any political power to choose black
representatives, they show themselves to be enemies of democracy
because they exclude black Americans from the democratic system. If
voters in Ohio and North Carolina don't protest vigorously and insist
that these electoral districts be redrawn, democracy in Ohio and
North Carolina is not functioning. Without an active electorate that
will not tolerate exclusions, that will not allow elected officials
to violate the rules and spirit of democracy, democracy exists in
name only.
Many
prestigious political organizations continuously exhort voters to go
and cast their ballots. But that is not good advice. They should
advise citizens to protest loudly when elected officials pass laws
that in effect exclude some citizens from participation or from
making use of their rights. An example is any law that requires
picture-IDs from voters who have no possible way of procuring such
an identification. In the present situation where only half the
people vote and very few people are willing to demonstrate their
displeasure and the need for change, we can no more claim to be a
democracy than the Philippines , or Turkey, or Germany in 1933.
No comments:
Post a Comment