Our
moral bankruptcy
The
news from home is not good.
Drug
deaths, especially in older white men, have increased significantly
in recent years. Drug overdoses are more frequent every year.
"Suicide
in the United States has surged to the highest level in nearly 30
years."
[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/health/us-suicide-rate-surges-to-a-30-year-high.html]
The suicide rate is particularly high among veterans and not, as one
would think, among combat veterans but among soldiers who spent their
tour of duty on military reservations back home.
[http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-veteran-suicide-20150115-story.html]
The
number of women who give birth and then succumb to postpartum
depression has increased in recent years.
[https://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2013/10 /131002131400.htm]
And
on a slightly different note, there is a steady increase of students
who miss classes in middle and in high school for more than 10% of
school days.
The
news is better with respect to the divorce rate, the frequency of
domestic violence, and the rate of physical and sexual abuse of
children. The incidence of all three has gone down but all of them,
of course, remain serious problems.
All
of these statistics are controversial. There are always real and
so-called experts who have different numbers. But these statistics
are regarded as reliable by people who understand statistics and who
know where these particular ones come from.
I
came across these data at the same time that newspapers reported an
apparently good piece of news, namely that household income has been
rising. On closer consideration, however, this good news is very
qualified. It turns out that individual
income
of people who work for wages has remained stagnant. Household income
has risen because people work more, work longer hours, work full time
where they worked part-time before.
Individual
income of wage earners remains unchanged at a time when corporations
report rising income. Corporations earn more money because they
manage to keep costs down and one significant kind of cost are labor
costs. Workers earning the same as what they took home a long time
ago is one of the reasons for the rosy earnings reports of
corporations. Workers are being exploited to benefit corporate bottom
lines.
The
failure of workers' wages to rise in a time when the well-to-do, the
recipients of dividends, the CEOs of enterprises, lawyers and
doctors, see their income go up and their standard of living
improving steadily is often blamed for the the reports about
depression and suicide and other negative statistics.
But
that explanation leaves out an important component of the malaise
that has our country in its grip. There are a large number of people
who feel insulted, whose sense of their own worth is under attack.
The
rise of neo-Nazis, of white supremacists is a clear symptom of this
offended sense of self. Significant numbers of Americans rest what
little self-esteem they have on their skin color – a characteristic
for which they cannot take credit. We are born with
different skin colors. They are not earned. They are not an
accomplishment. If the best I can say about myself is that I'm white,
I admit that I have not done
anything that I can take pride in.
The
white supremacist will reply: 'I am proud of being white because
whites are superior to persons of color.' But consider this analogy.
Jimmy is a member of an illustrious family: among his relatives are
a US President, a Supreme Court
Justice and several super-rich entrepreneurs. For himself, Jimmy has
not done so well. Married several times but now divorced, Jimmy has
had many jobs but is always living pay-check to pay-check. His life
has been a series of failures. But he is proud of his distinguished
family.
This is pride by association, a poor source of self-esteem for those
whose own life is beset with failures.
If
your self-affirmation rests on sharing the skin color of persons who
are famous for their accomplishments--ignoring for the moment whether
those accomplishments are mythical or real--you are acknowledging
that your own life is lacking in accomplishments and legitimate
sources of pride.
Why
are so many Americans unable to achieve a solid self-esteem? Why is
the color of their skin the most remarkable about them?
Success,
in America rests on being upwardly mobile. As the years pass, one
needs to increase one's earnings and in order to accomplish that one
needs, most of the time, to increase one's power to extract wealth
from other people. The working people whose salaries remain the same
year in, year out are the victims of this extraction of value.
Because their income is flat, their employer's prosper. The employer
has the power to keep them working for low wages. Their income does
not substantially rise; their power remains minimal.
By prevailing standards of success
in America these working people are not successful. They have not
accomplished anything.
This
version of success is reprehensible. This idea of what makes a life
worth living is utterly immoral. The good life according to this
American doctrine rests on the ability to harm others, to extract
value from them and their work. The successful people are those who
can injure others. Life
is not worth living for those who are unable to harm others.
Perhaps
this ethic is behind the American love affair with guns and the high
murder rate in some of our cities. If you cannot enrich yourself at
the expense of others, at least you can threaten them with your guns
or shoot them.
The
much discussed "opioid crisis," the rate of suicide and of
depression and other negative statistics such as the rate of poverty
in this, one of the richest countries in the world, is a symptom of
our moral failure. The big people, the people in the news,
are all rich and they have become rich at the expense of others. In
the prevailing morality that is acceptable. Devastated lives, misery,
is the result.
Only
a moral reformation would make America great again.
No comments:
Post a Comment