What
we can learn from the adventures of Chelsea Manning
Last
year Chelsea Manning was in prison serving a 35 year sentence for
releasing a lot of classified information to WikiLeaks. She had
entered prison seven years before as Bradley Manning a male soldier.
While in prison she transitioned to Chelsea Manning, a woman soldier.
Then
Pres. Obama commuted her sentence. Not too long afterward Harvard
University invited her to be a visitor at its Kennedy School where
future diplomats and bureaucrats train to work in the US government.
Every year the Kennedy School
invites a number of notables to be available to talk to the schools
students. The invitees this year included Manning. It also included
Sean Spicer, until recently spokesperson for President Trump and a
notorious liar. A third questionable appointment was Cory
Lewandowski, one time campaign manager for President Trump, known
for his disrespectful
treatment of women journalists.
No
one cared much about Spicer and Lewandowski. But the appointment of
Manning created an uproar. The current head of the CIA protested
loudly. One of the other appointees as visitors to the Kennedy
school, Michael Morell, a former CIA manager resigned his appointment
to the School.
Harvard
folded and uninvited Chelsea Manning. The Dean who had first invited
her professed that he was not aware that her appointment would be
controversial. Where has he been all these years?
(Manning
has since been invited to a prestigious book discussion on Nantucket.
Having been uninvited by Harvard has made her a desirable person to
invite to fancy events.)
There
are some interesting lessons to be learned from this whole
misadventure besides that you can be a dean at Harvard and be
incompetent or untruthful.
Pompeo,
the current head of the CIA, and the other former CIA manager
protested against Manning's appointment on the grounds that Manning
was "a traitor" and that releasing the information she did
possibly endangered many lives. Present and past managers on the CIA
stood up in protest against persons endangering human lives.
Impressive,
isn't it?
Two
days earlier in the newspaper carried a story that the CIA, which was
currently waging drone warfare in the Mideast and elsewhere but was
barred from using drone killings in Afghanistan, was urging the
President to allow them to employ drone weapons also in the war zone.
This story reminds us that the CIA is regulalrly killing people with
drones. The targets of the drone attacks are presumably terrorists.
Some drone attacks have been misdirected and killed large wedding
parties. Others may have succeeded in killing a terrorist but only at
the cost of also killing women and children at some festive event or
another.
The
protest of present and past CIA operatives against Manning for
possibly endangering human lives is massively hypocritical.
The
really interesting aspect of this entire story is that no one I have
heard of has called the CIA operatives on their hypocrisy. No one has
reminded them of what is part of their job day in day out – killing
people who have not been arrested, charged or tried – and often
killing people who are innocent of any political involvement.
Harvard
acceded to the demands of the CIA managers. Their story that Manning
had endangered lives was generally accepted. Manning was uninvited.
What
this tells us is that one of the important perks of political power
is that you can shape the dominant
narratives.
The way you tell the story is most likely to be believed by everyone
even if you story is transparently false or incomplete or misleading
or just a plain lie. The general public does not have to be forced to
believe this story spread by the powerful. No threats of arrest by
the secret police or of torture persuaded the general public that
Manning was not a suitable fellow at the Kennedy school while former
CIA managers complicit in the drone killing of civilians were
acceptable.
In
our present situation, powerful persons do not lie. On the whole,
most of us are naive enough to swallow that. This the lesson to be
learned from Chelsea Manning’s misadventure at Harvard.
No comments:
Post a Comment