Free markets
and illegal immigration
Slightly
more than two thirds of Americans believe that a free market benefits everyone. They also believe that illegal immigration
damages us, especially with respect to employment. They support more
stringent law enforcement against persons suspected of being in the
country illegally.
There
are no survey figures on how many people are aware of the
inconsistency of those two beliefs.
Our
economy consists of many different markets -- markets for food or
cars; markets for capital such as mortgages, stocks and bonds,
derivatives; markets for labor whether for day laborers, who pick the
lettuce in the Imperial Valley in California, or the CEO for a major
global corporation.
In
each market, sellers offer what they want to sell and compete with
each other for customers by lowering the asking prices. In each
market buyers come in to purchase what they want and compete with
each other by raising the price they are offering. The current level
of prices for any commodity depends on the size of the supply
relative to demand. If a given commodity sells at a given price, a
significant increase in supply of a commodity will lead to lower
prices. A much larger supply can be sold only at lower prices than
before the supply increased.
That
applies to food. During the summer strawberries are more plentiful
and therefore cheaper than they are in the winter. After a bountiful
harvest of oranges the price goes down. If a part of the crop freezes
during a cold winter, the price for orange juice goes up.
The
same is true of labor. If we opened our borders to the South and
allowed people from all over Latin America to enter the country
freely, wages would drop precipitously because of the large
additional supply of workers. Employers could pick and choose and pay
a fraction of what they pay today. (I will ignore, for the present,
the fact that American corporations as well as the US government bear
much of the responsibility for unemployment in Latin America)
We
maintain current wage levels by restricting the supply of labor. We
maintain current wage levels by restricting immigration. Whatever
many people say they believe about free markets, when it comes to
labor they do not believe in a free market.
This
inconsistency conceals a profound moral insight: Labor markets are
immoral. Every person is entitled to a good job. A good job is one
that supports you and your family. A good job is one you'll not hate
going to every day. Your getting a good job should not depend on the
uncertainties of a labor market. No one should be able to take your
job and ship it off to China. No one should be able to force you to
take a lower wage because someone else is also looking for a job and
is depressing the price of yours.
Markets
are not always in balance. At the end of the day, sellers may be left
over with some goods which no one wanted to buy from them. That
incurs a loss but is not a tragedy. But if at the end of the day not
all the sellers of the ability to work have found a job, that is
a tragedy. Sometimes goods sell in markets only if the price is
lowered drastically. That is not a tragedy when we are selling fruit
at the end of the day. But it is a tragedy when it forces people to
work two and three jobs just to get by.
Labor
markets are profoundly unjust. They treat people as if their strength
and intelligence were no different from eggs or potatoes. They treat
people as if they were things.
We
are right to believe that there should be no markets in labor. As
fellow citizens we owe each other a good job for everyone.
Demanding
a good job for everyone does not condone police persecution of people
with darker skin. It does not condone depriving anyone of health care
or of educational opportunities. It does not support anti-immigrant
laws passed in Arizona or Georgia.
nation states are obsolete
ReplyDelete