Mass Producing the Citizenry
One source of our great wealth is
the capacity to mass-produce commodities. The computers, cars,
cell-phones, and the like can sell cheaply because they are produced
in very large numbers. More and more persons can buy these glittering
toys and tools as they come off the assembly line, indistinguishable,
one exactly like the other.
We would not want our children, and
the next generation that is growing up, to be similarly
indistinguishable from each other. Every human being is, in some way,
unique. Each of us has capacities all our own that are different from
those of our neighbor. If these capacities are developed, we all turn
out to be unique. Each of us can make special contributions to our
lives and the lives of those around us. Our lives will be enriched by
the great variety of skills and knowledges each citizen contributes.
Life will be more interesting, richer in possibilities.
But these differences must be
fostered. We do not have
them at birth. If we fail to encourage them, citizens grow up to be
very much like each other. They turn into mass produced persons very
similar to the commodities we buy.
Our society is rapidly developing
into a huge machine to mass produce human beings, because it is not
willing to allow and to encourage each child, each young person, to
develop their differences from every one else, to be a person in his
or her own right.
Yes, there are some private schools
where classes are small and have enough teachers to address each
child individually, to perceive the special ability of each and to
help nourish those individual gifts. But the public schools most of
our children attend are large, classes are large. Here crowd control,
laying down clear rules of behavior and making sure that every child
conforms are much more important. Moreover, thanks to supposed
government education experts and masters of mass-production, like
Bill Gates, children are constantly drilled to pass tests—the same
tasks for every child. Our education ignores individual differences
and trains children to be very much like each other.
These children are reared to become
consumers of the identical commodities produced by our factories.
They learn to judge each other by their consumption, by wearing the
right jeans or sneakers. Capacities that set each child apart do not
matter. Having the right clothes, the same clothes worn by many other
children, does.
Often the parents of these children
work for very large organizations. They are hired and evaluated by
superficial criteria because in these large organizations there is no
time to get to know employees and to appreciate them for their
individual gifts. Instead they pass standard tests, they are judged
by whether they dress like others, whether their conversation is
familiar. Being different is not a recommendation. Conformity is.
It is Oscar night when we find out
what are the most popular movies. The push is to see the movies
watched by the greatest number of people. There are best seller lists
of books and we are encouraged to read the books read by most other
people. There are obvious economic interests in the background:
publishers want to sell as many copies as they can of any book they
have on their list. Oscars and similar prizes, best seller lists are
ways of increasing sales. For the citizenry they are another push
toward homogenization.
If you go to buy clothes, the sales
person may well urge you to buy that shirt you seem to like by
telling you that it has sold very well. Many people liked it. So you
should like it and buy it too.
The pressure towards conformity is
strong in politics too. Candidates for public office need to get
large numbers of votes; more than their competitor. They cannot
afford to offend anyone. You can best not be offensive to anyone's
sensibilities by only saying whatever everyone else says on any
given topic. The less distinct your statements are, the better. The
more wishy-washy the candidates, the more likely that they get
elected.
Accordingly, it is best to be in the
middle of any disagreement. Any opinion or statement that someone
labels as “extreme” is a problem. Extremists have no chance of
being elected because they are not like everyone else.
With every year we more and more
come to resemble those gadgets we buy. Differences between us
disappear or are ignored and shoved aside instead of being developed
and encouraged. The people you talk to are more and more like you. We
become progressively more interchangeable. It matters less whether
anyone of us is alive or dead because there are many persons still
alive who are just like me. As we become more interchangeable and
anonymous our lives lose in value.
Individual human life matters less
and less as human beings are more and more like machine products,
one just like the next one.
No comments:
Post a Comment