Bombing ISIL: defense of or attack
on democracy?
Democracy is generally considered to
be a political system in which citizens share equal power in
determining government policy and/or who is going to be in the
government.
Now ISIL a group we did not know
about three months ago, rampages thought Iraq and parts of Syria,
killing innocents, beheading hostages. President Obama decides to
start bombing them.
The President refuses to consult
Congrees because he says, they are only bombing, there are no
soldiers involved in the fighting. So it is not a war. In actual fact
we are sending soldiers to Iraq to train the Iraqi army. “Well,”
the White House says. “They are not shooting at anyone.” Suppose
they get shot at? And anyway is training soldiers not participating
in a war?
The White House is not only
threatening democracy by not asking citizens, it is treating us a
utter idiots. And, yes, if citizens are idiots then democracy may not
be such a good idea.
You'd have to be a lawyer to take
the claim that we are not starting another war seriously. Can you
imagine the people on the ground saying, as the bombs rain down on
them, “Thank God, this is not a war”?
The President starts an air war
unilaterally. His legal staff assures him that he does not have to
consult Congress.
But that is surely an insult to our
democracy. It says that the President can get us involved in one more
war and the people are not to be consulted, neither are their
representatives.
Congress is not doing much better.
Leaders of both parties have suggested Congress not talk about this
latest war before the elections. Their first priority is to win the
upcoming elections. But why are they so eager to get elected or
reelected? They are not eager to formulate national policy on this
all important issue of war or peace. They are certainly not
interested in representing voters. Many people are concerned about
this new war. But Congress says: “let's not talk about it.” That
is hardly the ideal choice of those who want to be the peoples'
representatives.
Being in Congress must be a nice job
even if you don't do what people elect you for.
With the November elections looming,
I get frequent messages from my Congressman asking me for money. I
have not heard any questions about the new air war. The congressman
wants me to help him get reelected so that he can represent me. While
he is running for reelection, he cannot interest himself in what I
and other constituents think on this terribly important question of
war and peace. He is an exceptional Congressman and I support him
gladly. But it reflects on the terrible distortions of our democracy
that election campaigns are ever longer—look at Hilary running for
President—and are all consuming so that our representatives cannot
do the job we elect them for.
What a sorry state of affairs! This
new war shows clearly the extent to which ordinary citizens have been
disenfranchised.
No comments:
Post a Comment