After the election
We have a pretty good idea of
what will happen now that the Republicans are more powerful than
ever: more tax benefits for the rich, more hardship for the poor, and
more saber rattling and war-making in foreign policy. The voters
wanted a change. I am not sure they are going to like the changes
they get.
But this is the time to look at
what will not change
whoever gets elected. A political scientist at Tufts University,
Michael Glennon, has recently argued that significant portions of the
federal government are in no way under control of elected officials.
Leadership in these shadowy agencies is handed down from one person
to the other without consultation with the voters or elected members
of the executive branch. Their policies are made by officials not
elected and most of the time are shrouded in deep secrecy. Voters
not only have no control over the national security apparatus and its
allies in the military, but most of the time they do not know what
policies are being made and executed.
Glennon makes this point
impressively. He reminds us that before Obama was elected president
in 2008 he promised to close Guantanamo Bay. He opposed the Patriot
Act and government spying on civilians. He was a champion of civil
liberties. He was an opponent of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But once he was elected Guantanamo Bay remained open. Obama
conducted the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. His administration has
continued the surveillance of civilians begun during the previous
administration and has been harsh in prosecuting government
whistleblowers. This
administration has
consistently supported government secrecy. It has been hostile to the
press and press freedom.
That is not the Barack Obama
who campaigned in 2008 and whom we elected. Glennon explains this
sudden reversal by arguing that the security apparatus of such
agencies as the National Security Administration and the Central
Intelligence Agency operate mostly in secrecy. What they do sometimes
comes out after it is all done. But elected officials and the voters
have no control over their projects – one more bizarre and sinister
than the next. Hence Obama's government failed to do what he had
promised the voters.
A long time ago Bill Moyers
presented a Public Broadcasting Special about this secretive and
undemocratic security apparatus. It was created he said when Harry
Truman signed the National Security Act in 1947 that created both the
National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency. Very
soon these new agencies proved to be a major liability to the U.S.
In 1952
the Iranian people electorate Mohammed
Mossadegh to be their
Prime Minister. Our
government had liked him until he decided that Iranian oil should not
be owned by British interests and nationalized the Iranian oil
industry. Such a move was anathema to all the capitalists and
anti-communists in the United States. The CIA cooked up a plot to
have Mossadegh toppled by a popular uprising and the Iranian
military. The Shah of Iran returned and began a reign of terror. The
CIA helped him to set up his secret police force that arrested people
without trial, tortured and killed them.
CIA complicity in the events in
Iran were not known at the time. They could not be discussed in our
political arena. 60 years later we harvest the bitter fruits of this
insane CIA project. That was the beginning of a series of secret
interventions in the Middle East that have made us the most unpopular
government in that part of the world. The men and women who died in
Iraq and Afghanistan did not, as we often say, fight for our
freedoms. Rather, they
harvested the bitter fruits of the CIA intervention in Iran and many
other secret manipulations of Middle Eastern policies—policies
not motivated by concern for our freedoms or those of peoples in the
Mid-East but designed to maintain corporate profits.
Two wars are now winding down.
Another one in Syria and Iraq is just beginning. We owe those wars to
the secret projects not controlled by our elected government. Voting
has become a lot less effective because large portions of foreign
policy are made we don't know by nameless
“security” planners.
The effects of those secret
projects by agencies not elected by us or supervised by our elected
representatives, are felt not only in foreign policy but in the price
all of us pay for the wars we fight, the losses many families
sustain, the returning veterans seriously affected by their service,
the moneys blown on weapons and warfare, that are not available to
provide needed services to returning veterans, to build new schools,
to hire more teachers, to repair roads and bridges and ameliorate the
lives of the poorest, the elderly and disabled.
If we want to restore our
democracy and peoples' control of the government, we need to
dismantle
the secretive national security apparatus, including the National
Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency and
replace it by agencies solidly under democratic control.
No comments:
Post a Comment